Freedom of BLEEP

If you have been reading this blog, then you know that President Obama will directly oversee the 2010 census. Why does he want this power?

The Wall Street Journal reports that the 2010 census will count all persons physically present in the country - including all of the illegal immigrants. That’s right… Illegals will now affect the apportionment of House members and Electoral College votes for each state.*

Here’s why that’s a big deal:

According to the latest American Community Survey, California has 5,622,422 noncitizens in its population of 36,264,467. Based on our round-number projection of a decade-end population in that state of 37,000,000 (including 5,750,000 noncitizens), California would have 57 members in the newly reapportioned U.S. House of Representatives.

However, with noncitizens not included for purposes of reapportionment, California would have 48 House seats (based on an estimated 308 million total population in 2010 with 283 million citizens, or 650,000 citizens per House seat).

So basically, the most liberal state in the Union will get nine free House seats.

That is just one example of how Obama’s census corruption will work against a fair election. South Florida will be a similar scenario. In addition to that, most illegal immigrants tend to live in or near large cities, particularly in slums. Areas of the country that are typically more liberal stand to gain a larger apportionment of Congress with the 2010 enumeration. Our founding fathers provided a clear set of rules to protect the integrity of our elections, and Democrats are doing everything they can to work around these rules.

Disregarding the Constitution has become commonplace in the liberal camp. They don’t care about your rights and they certainly don’t care about representing you. All they care about is power. If you oppose them they’ll call you un-American, and then they’ll make up lies about how they saw you wearing Swastikas. President Obama and the Democrats are trying to hijack this country from the American people.

Please tell your friends about this. Democracy is at stake.

* Yes, illegal immigrants have been counted with the short form since 1980. But it’s the long form that inquires about citizenship and is used for congressional redistricting. Now the long form will not be used in 2010.

The US Department of Justice has ordered the state of Georgia to stop verifying voter registrations. Not only does this prevent Georgia from verifying that voters are actually citizens, but it prevents the state from verifying that the person even exists! Now non-citizens and dead people can legally vote! That is how much Obama hates democracy.

Yes, this is really happening. Read this memo issued by the Georgia Secretary of State, in which she rebukes the “shocking disregard for the integrity of our elections.”

This mandate from the Obama Administration is completely illogical and unnecessary. Not a single person has come forward to say he or she could not vote because of the verification process.

It’s quite obvious that Obama is trying to facilitate his fellow “community organizers.” Members of undeniably corrupt organizations like ACORN will be casting votes in every precinct under a different name. Truck loads of illegals will be taken to the polls. Democracy is under assault; not in a country on the other side of the world, but right here in the United States.

The Obama Administration is corrupt and power-thirsty… A dangerous combination. But Hugo Chavez said it best: “Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right!”

Sign the petition initiated by Karen Handel, Georgia Secretary of State!

About $4 billion of the stimulus package will be handed out to organizations like ACORN. This group of henchmen for the Democratic Party get in trouble almost every election for voter fraud. And they’ve been at it again.

In Las Vegas, ACORN is being charged on 26 counts of voter fraud and 13 counts for compensating those registering voters. And these are directors being charged, not irresponsible underlings that the organization can sweep under the rug.

From coast to coast, ACORN has been creating fraudulent registrations and submitting fraudulent votes. How can they eligible for stimulus money (that was obviously intended for them)?

Simply because there is no accountability. Who is in charge of oversight for stimulus spending? Why, you are, of course! How are you supposed to do this? You can’t!

“The government website dedicated to the spending won’t have details on contracts and grants until October and may not be complete until next spring — halfway through the program, administration officials said.” Isn’t the government great?

The best part is that the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board blames the delay on their server - which doesn’t have enough data storage capacity. Is this brand new government department using a computer from the 80’s? A single gigabyte can easily store several hundred thousand pages of text. I suppose the next year will be spent migrating small sections of data to the new server using a 3.5 floppy disk.

Or perhaps more likely, the Transparency Board will spend the next year doing exactly what they were told to do. Nothing! So much for President Obama’s promise to scrutinize “every dime” of how the $787 billion stimulus package is spent.

Former comedian Al Franken apparently believes that democracy is a joke. After the recount, Franken pulled ahead in the Minnesota Senate election - but now 25 precincts have more ballots than voters who signed in to vote.

Shortly after the election, “misplaced” ballots began to show up exactly where you would expect to find tickets favoring a democratic candidate, such as the car of an election official and an old storage warehouse. And just as you would expect, a vast majority of these ballots racked up additional votes for Franken. It’s almost funny.

But it’s not only the newly “found” ballots that are landing extra Franken votes. Numerous votes have been double-counted. We can thank the entrusted election officials again, who made duplicates of “damaged ballots” but failed to separate the originals.

It seems the board of elections in Minnesota does not share our nostalgia for the good old days when votes only counted once. One board member, State Supreme Court Justice G. Barry Anderson, acknowledged it is “very likely there was a double counting,” yet the board says they don’t have the authority to question local officials. There are more ballots than voters, and merely acknowledging the likelihood of double counting is the best they can do.

During the recount, the board only made decisions that favored Franken. Hennepin County precinct had 133 less ballots in the recount, but the board went with the election night total: a net gain of 43 votes for Franken. But when Ramsey County precinct ended up with 177 more ballots than election night, they went with the new recount total: a net gain of 37 votes for Franken. This all seems like a bad joke.

Not Photoshopped

Based on poll results and numerous surveys of the media, it seems apparent that uninformed voters and biased news sources won the election for Barack Obama.

First, it’s worth noting that many Obama voters were so politically uninformed it’s embarrassing:

57.4% of Obama voters could not correctly say which party controls congress, and more than half of these voters incorrectly thought Republicans control congress. Statistically, this performance is worse than random guessing!

More than a third of Obama voters didn’t know who Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid are. One democrat described Nancy Pelosi as “pretty cool,” but was unable to describe her roll in the government. The poll also indicated that substantially more republican voters were informed about Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

Secondly, polls have revealed that many democrats knew very little about their own candidate:

88.4% could not correctly identify Obama as the candidate that said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket. Again, this is statistically worse than random guessing.

82.6% could not correctly say that Obama won his first election by getting his opponents kicked off the ballot.

56.1% of Obama voters didn’t know that Obama began his political career at the home of Bill Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist who said his bombings “didn’t do enough.”

Conversely, here’s what Obama voters knew about Sarah Palin:

94% of Obama voters correctly identified Palin as the candidate with a pregnant teenage daughter.

86% of Obama voters identified Palin as the candidate who spent $150,000 on a campaign wardrobe.

86.9 % of Obama voters thought that Palin said she could see Russia from her “house.” However, this quote actually came from Tina Fey on Saturday Night Live.

How did so many American’s gather such slanted knowledge? A study performed by a writer for the Washington Post may contain a few clues:

“[Washington Post] readers have been consistently critical of the lack of probing issues coverage and what they saw as a tilt toward Democrat Barack Obama. My surveys, which ended on Election Day, show that they are right on both counts.”

This “news” paper published 246% more laudatory opinion pieces exalting Barack Obama than the number of opinion pieces in favor of John McCain. And this only scratches the surface. The Post also had more stories dedicated to Obama, published more photos of Obama, and contained closer coverage of the Obama campaign. Simultaneously, the number of negative pieces released about McCain exceeded the number of negative Obama pieces by 181%. At least their slogan doesn’t proclaim The Post is fair and balanced.

This revolting degree of bias was exhibited by virtually every media outlet in America, according to Journalism.org:

God bless America.

The Senate runoff election between incumbent Saxby Chambliss and Jim Martin takes place tomorrow. Before dropping a vote for Jim Martin, consider the following:

1.) Jim Martin voted for the largest tax increase in the history of Georgia.

2.) Jim Martin proposed legislation that would increase property tax by 150 percent.

3.) Jim Martin voted to eliminate mandatory minimum sentences for drug dealers, voted against making extremely violent criminals serve their entire prison sentence, and voted against making it a felony to distribute drugs within 1000 feet of a school.

4.) Jim Martin voted twice against making English the official language of Georgia.

5.) Jim Martin supports the Card Check bill, which will eliminate the secret ballot for union votes.